but, it's interesting that the reviews are talking about it as though it's experimental, or more abstract, or branching out. relative to what, exactly? not even themselves; they were far more adventurous in the 90s.
it sounds like what it is - some aging rock stars that are trying to rekindle their interest and stay relevant, which...i'm trying not to be dismissive. it could be far worse, really. well, check out four of the five records that preceded this one - it was worse.
i'll give them credit for being methodical, at least; it's been a long time since the last one, and there at least isn't any empty filler, here, like there so often has been. these tracks may be a little safe and predictable for my own tastes, and the band may have moved on, as is their prerogative at their age, but at least they're properly worked out, fully developed. they took their time on this and did it right, they didn't just churn it out. fans that have kept with them should appreciate that.
but, beyond a few points, i'm just not feeling it.
i'll say this, though - if this is the last pearl jam record for a while, it's at least a decent ending point. but, if it's a transition into a string of late records, the next one might potentially be a legit return to form.
