Wednesday, October 5, 2022
first draft release of inri094
Tuesday, September 27, 2022
2022 ytd temp archive
...my fourth lp (inri041), completed in late 2000, was remixed in 2014:
when this is working properly, suppose that the front page has the digest for sept 20th, 2022. if i hit "previous posts", which i suspect nobody does, it will go directly to the digest for sept 19th. if i hit previous posts again, it will strictly show sept 13th. this will undo the backwards posting problem that is endemic to social media, which has long bothered me (see my twitter page fore a satire of it).
2:08
i need to temporarily break my silence.
i do hope that gorbachev's funeral is open casket.
3:44
it turns out that the downside of the scotch bonnets is that my hands are left viciously burning for hours after handling them.
i don't want to waste large amounts of plastic repeatedly discarding gloves for the single use of handling hot peppers. i've just been going commando on them. we'll see what else i can think of. i suppose i always have a few plastic bags on their way to the recycle drying in the sink. i could just reuse the same one over and over and put it in the freezer. yeah, that sounds like an easy answer, actually.
like, i want to wash my face right now, and i can't. i can barely even type. yet, i'm not tired. so, what to do, exactly?
9:33
another frequent undesired edit that i'm seeing as i archive posts here for better data integrity in storage is the replacement of assyria with babylon. i am sure i wouldn't make that mistake, as i understand the words i'm using (and the editor obviously doesn't, but is rather being driven by fuzzy, racist ideas of semitic supremacy through the perverse filter of ethnic nationalism).
the semitic babylonians had a different culture and religion than the non-semitic (and apparently caucasian) sumerians, and they clearly had a different language and were clearly of a different race, but they largely built their society on top of the existing sumerian one. while there are definite destruction horizons in both the archaeological record and the historical record (as we can reconstuct it from ancient cuneiform tablets), babylonian culture was largely developed out of continuity from sumerian culture, so there is a definite process of succession. i'm very clear to point that out and speak of it in those terms, especially in regards to the astronomy, which is about the only thing i really care about in regards to sumeria or babylonia.
the assyrians were half-literate barbarians that took over some cities in the north by the force of violence and created a brutal, draconian dictatorship responsible for immense destruction and widespread genocide. while the babylonians existed in succession to sumeria, the assyrians destroyed what was left of sumerian culture and substituted a wide-ranging dark age in it's place. the destruction of babylon by assyria was probably worse, in terms of data loss, than the destruction of baghdad by the mongols and is the direct reason we know so little about ancient sumeria beyond what we can reconstruct through fragments of clay found in abandoned 3000 year old buildings.
while the assyrians and babylonians were both semitic peoples, and that may be all that matters to the editor, you really can't substitute one for the other. one was an advanced civilization built on top of the alpha cradle of civilization, while the other was a barbaric monstrosity that ultimately completely destroyed it. the compare and contrast essay needs to be about the contrast.
the editor uses the term "babylon" in a vague, colloquial sense that implies a strictly judaic religious context. this isn't somebody with much understanding of secular history or the science of archaeology, but somebody that gets their naive "understanding" of history entirely from religious mythology. all the editor understands about babylon is what is written about it by the cultural conservatives that wrote the hebrew bible.
by switching to offline writing for data storage, i hope i can get around this unwanted editing to the point that i can actually prove it's happening. as stated repeatedly, all i can find is consistency in the emails, which are supposed to act as data redundancy, even when it comes to posts that i'm certain were edited. i've convinced myself this is happening by tricking the system, but it doesn't let me prove it (yet.), as it is self-correcting in my own editing to create a false, projected reality of manipulated stasis. worse, it's driving me bonkers trying to prove my writing is being altered, and being unable to do so. i'm either correct, or i've lost my mind; the fact that i'm lucid suggests the former.
i'm going to catch them soon, i'm sure of it. it will be easy enough to run the two sources through a diffchecker, but i can't do that when everything is online and nothing is certain, as a consequence of it; i can neither have confidence in the integrity of the emails, nor in the integrity of the blog posts, as accurate alpha sources. proving that corruption is happening requires having a source i can trust the integrity of.
for now, note yet another example of clear manipulation in the editor's confused use of assyria and babylonia as interchangeable terms, due to ignorance resulting from the racism that results from the supremacy inherent to ethnic nationalism.
10:21
glasnost.
11:38
11:51
i would support the existence of the climate police. that sounds like a great idea, if you ask me.
i mean, you're serious about this, or you're not. the reality is that pollution is a crime against humanity and that there should be an enforcement mechanism to enforce that reality. a climate police would be a proportionate, reasonable response to the challenge we face; conversely, tax cuts for the rich to try to influence their behaviour followed by slaps on the wrist for non-compliance in the name of "freedom" is not reasonable or proportionate, and is not taking the situation nearly seriously enough.
when somebody proposes a solution that might actually work, the government feels the need to debunk the idea. it's reflective of where we actually are as a society on this, and what the set of likely outcomes actually is.
if we're going to have police, this is exactly what they should be doing. instead, we send people out with guns to enforce property rights that allow people to pollute. we'll get what we deserve for it, in the end.
reference:
"environment canada says online reports of 'climate police' are false", cbc news, sept 1, 2022
19:29
an ye harm none, do what ye will
ok.
not only does pollution not harm none, but pollution harms all. it is not a lesser crime deserving of a lesser punishment, or merely a behavioural problem worthy of scolding, as one does a child; it is the worst type of crime that is deserving of the most severe penalties, and the most egregious form of anti-social behaviour, indicative of a severe deficit of basic decency and a depravity of character of the most irredeemable quality.
climate police are a wonderful idea. let's do it right away.
20:07
so, this is day one of the new digest format. i hope my intent is a little more clear. i have this stored in both doc and html format in a secret location, which will make it easier to print to pdf in a 5x8" format for journal publication, or viewed on a pc or laptop. throw your phone in the garbage.
what am i doing with the recent posts that i don't trust the integrity of?
first, i'm taking it all down. then, i'm copying it over to the secret location. after that, i'll need to inspect it, probably rewrite the bulk of it and eventually repost it. it will come up in a 5x8" printable format as i repost it.
this process won't be very fast, and the last few months of posts might consequently be offline for a long time.
it is worth noting, though, that i'll be updating the other blogs now as digests as well.
23:43
friday, september 2, 2022
so, that's now updated for the day.
today's digests include one 2-3 page post for the following blogs:
1) the dsdfghghfsdflgkfgkja politics/general blog, which has recently been the only blog i've been posting to. almost everything gets posted to that blog, with the exception of very targeted posts to the music blogs. this is listed as "rants" in the list on the side of the page.
2) the deathtokoalas "music review" blog, as it is listed on the side. this is a general cultural commentary blog that also features some sporadic commentary on lighter news sources. i included the posts on climate change and the historical analysis for the reason that these topics frequently overlap with cultural discussions from well known authors (although the post in question does not), and that qualifies as cultural commentary. my decision tree on this is rather complicated and there's going to be a lot of ambiguity around it. the only post i removed from this digest was the analysis of the recent ukrainian tactic of destroying infrastructure around the dnieper as a scorched earth policy to attempt to slow the russian advance into the rest of ukraine. this blog would generally exclude specifically political commentary or analysis, like statistical analysis of polling results, which was the real basis of separating it out, as i wanted my political and cultural commentaries split into different streams. in better times, it was directed at actual music reviews. i don't really know how much of an interest i have in that, moving forwards, but i have always had a sort of a hitchensian gossip streak and this blog will at the least allow for that.
3) the peculiar adventures of j, or the travel blog, as it is listed on the side, which was supposed to be the blog i used to narrate events in real-time while i was out with my chromebook in order to quarantine my main account from insecure networks but has instead become a general geography blog since i had to move to the chromebook for general network access, which led to me merging the two accounts. the scope of the blog has had to increase to be self-contained, but the idea is that this blog recollects events that occur somewhere outside, in the real world, from a first-person perspective. it isn't always, but it's supposed to be a little more narrative based. all posts posted to the general blog today were also posted to the travel blog, which may seem weird, but it just happened to be that all of the posts on this day fit into one of the categories that this blog touches upon. on other days, posting to this blog may be quite light.
i will not normally describe the contents of digest updates in detail, but this is a good opportunity to repost what the purpose of the various blogs is. i'm in the process of finally reconstructing my typing station, so it is time to get back to normal posting schedules at all of the various blogs. this systems collapse has been lengthy and deep, but i am rectifying it, even as i'm convinced i'm still under extreme surveillance, despite not understanding why.
there are a number of blogs that were not updated today:
- the inri records blog is intended to mirror my music archive at bandcamp. this has been left stranded for a while now, but i should be back to it shortly.
- the current music blog is a music journal that is maintained in order to document my recording process for future generations and is consequently only active when i am actually recording. soon. i hope.
- j's journal is the blog written from my perspective when i was a young child as a vehicle to explain influences on my musical development, while growing up. i will need to aggressively get back to writing this very shortly. i have just realized that the formatting on it has annoyingly broken for a second time, so i'll need to fix that, first. the first time, i just needed to clear cookies, so maybe it's not so bad.
- the alter-reality is the journal written from my perspective as a teenager, which is when my recording career first began. i will need to finish the childhood journal before i get back to that.
- the music timeline was created in order to replace my facebook music page, because i actually liked the timeline feature which got buried and destroyed by successive facebook updates, and remains a work in progress. the only reason i didn't delete my facebook page in 2013 is that i liked the timeline, as a way to present data historically.
4) as of right now, i have added a new blog on the side called the "diet blog". today's digest only includes one post to this new blog, about scotch bonnet peppers. this blog will eventually be constructed to include all of the posts that have been posted to the general blog about my diet, starting at the end of 2020. i may or may not decide to backdate this blog, but the intent is that it starts in late 2020 and runs until i have attained dietary perfection.
i served a document this morning and will need to get to the court house today to swear an affidavit for it. i will otherwise be continuing the archiving process overnight.
3:03
i didn't even know that blogger had a feed until now. i don't expect i'll use it, but it's helpful to know it's there. i've lost all interest in reading feeds.
i don't know why anybody would post to facebook or twitter at this point when they could post to blogger instead, if what they want is a place to archive posts and debate ideas (i have comments turned off here because i attract the worst kinds of trolls, but i actively encourage you to start a debate with me over email, with the expectation that i will post the result here at the conclusion of the discourse). i mean, i understand why people would use facebook as an instant messaging service, but i don't understand why anybody would actually post a message to facebook at this point and i don't understand the attraction to twitter at all.
the larger user base is a benefit, no doubt, but the reality is that there are many sites with large user bases today and no one site has the monopoly on a large user base that some once feared that facebook might end up with. user bases and active user bases are not the same thing, and active user bases will fluctuate over time. this sounds obvious, but a new site can build both users and active users if it has features that active users find attractive - that's been thoroughly demonstrated, and the fear of inertia once held by many has really been thoroughly debunked as unfounded. you need a catch, granted - we don't need 27 different facebooks and sites will fail if they just redesign facebook - but that has been less difficult to actualize than was once thought. the argument that you need to go to where the users are due to fear that they won't migrate made sense a few years ago when people were still a little less active online, but it's been demonstrated at this point that people will use multiple platforms simultaneously, so there's certainly room for many platforms in the world without the need for them to engage in direct competition. what competition means in social networking is still somewhat unclear. you don't have to delete your facebook page to start a blog, nor are people as siphoned off by sitewalls as it was once feared they might be. i'm stating that i don't know why anybody would use facebook as a blog when they could have an actual blog instead, but what i'm really getting across is that there's no actual competition, as you really can't use facebook as a blog. so, why isn't blogger full of traffic, then?
i state this while i'm typing into a word processor to avoid censorship, but i'm a unique case; i wouldn't expect this is a widespread activity on behalf of google or is happening to very many other people, and i'd suspect that facebook and microsoft are under the same coercive pressures that google is to ensure that the scrubbing is comprehensive. facebook is so locked down, i can't even post there; it's like trying to have a debate in a fucking church. youtube won't let you post the word gorilla. i've long considered google the least likely suspect for destructive censorship, but i have to acknowledge that this couldn't be happening if they weren't allowing it to happen, even if it's being pushed down on them from a government, rather than a decision made internally. there is a substantive difference between how google and facebook approach the issue in their legal documents, and i don't think that's for show, i think it reflects different organizational priorities. the reality is that they've been far less aggressive than other platforms when it comes to enforcing destructive censorship, but it's not possible that what i'm sure is happening could be actually happening without cooperation from the server admins. it's not possible to explain how email in my inbox is being edited in place, otherwise.
i'm no fan of elon musk, but i sympathized with his logic in trying to buy twitter, even if i don't think twitter is the right platform for what he was trying to protect. twitter was intended to be a site to transmit succinctly phrased statements that are valuable for mere moments, running from stupid catchphrases and slogans to carefully worded business english. it's great for, like, stock trading, or as an emergency notification system, but it's garbage for actual discourse. the town square musk was imagining does exist and is blogger.
unfortunately, like our actual town squares, blogger is mostly empty and void of substantive discourse. it's here if we want to use it, but perhaps the truth is that we don't. regardless, it should be maintained, like our empty town squares are, and perhaps mr. musk may want to inquire as to what google intends to do with blogger, moving forwards.
the site may not have the largest user base, but the users it does have are unlikely to migrate any time soon and it will always attract people that want to actually type, in the deficit of other places to do so.
3:33
maybe he should abolish the house of commons and replace it with a twitter account. this is the obvious deduction from the brevity of business english enforced by twitter: if you can't fit the legislation in a tweet, it's clearly too complicated and needs to be shortened up. stop wasting your time with elaborate thoughts - subsume yourself within the succinctness of the despotic brevity of the ubiquitous tweet. submit.
wait, though. isn't that what the last president tried to do?
reference:
"pierre polievre promises new law against government jargon", ctv news, sept 1, 2022
3:49
"gummamint's for regular talkin', not for fancy talkin'"
3:55
no, i'm not like john galt
you fucking idiots.
6:54