Saturday, September 28, 2013
the silver mt. zion memorial orchestra & tra-la-la band with choir - this is our punk rock, thee rusted satellites that gather + sing
Classic
this was the first gybe/mt. zion record that i wasn't salivating over the day it came out. in fact, i was actually in a rather different mental state. i barely even registered it's existence.
the female i was living with at the time had picked it up. i thought this a little strange, as it wasn't really previously in her sphere of interest. she really liked the second record, though; perhaps i had expanded her horizons a little? then again, a lot of people really liked the second record. see, a war had just started. a social movement was beginning...
....or, at least, that's what it felt like, anyways. people that i had known for years and listened to a cross of alternative rock, reggae, funk, political rap....all of a sudden these people were picking up mt. zion records. they were somewhat shocked that this was the kind of thing i liked.
well, yeah, it was the kind of thing i liked, and the feeling was mutual. the whole buzz around the band, combined with reviews indicating a vocal focus, really scared me off. i wrote it off without ever really giving it a chance; it wasn't until a few years had passed that i went back and gave it a serious listen.
i learned a couple of things at the time:
1) when political music threatens to affect real change, the movement surrounding the music gets co-opted into just another mainstream trend and it brings out a lot of poseurs that are attracted to the music for it's trend status. they get interested for all the wrong reasons, bring their status quo attitudes in and counteract that developing movement. therefore, music cannot affect real change. what happens, instead, is that musical movements conform to their surroundings. ultimately, the sale and distribution of music is too inherently capitalistic to act as a force against it. it's a design flaw that marx missed altogether; plato was describing an effect rather than a cause. if you study musical trends before and after this, the same pattern emerges. that at least makes it easy to understand what refused was focused around near the end, even if their approach turned out to have about the worst effect possible. you can reach an audience with music, but you can't kickstart a movement that way. if we take plato more seriously than marx, we can maybe understand this music better as a reaction to the failure of the alter-globalization movement than as the start of something in itself; a resigned reaction of accepted failure, a soundtrack not to the end of the prevailing status quo but to a resigned, if scathing, acknowledgement of the end of history.
2) i'm way more anti-social and suspicious of the mainstream than even i ever realized. i always told myself i wouldn't be the type that would drop a favourite band just because they went mainstream. the thing is that mt. zion went mainstream in a way that hit me off guard. i was expecting the next radiohead, not the next rage against the machine. the scene that built up around them was full of precisely the kind of people i was trying to escape from....
i did notice that mt. zion seemed to disappear from the tips of these people's tongues as quickly as it entered them. i figured this was their ten minutes, they watered themselves down to get it, it's all over now. next up: efrim doing green day songs to play over the radio system at your local walmart, and discussion of their early work coming only in hushed tones as something that only freaks could like. fucking dark side. ugh. hey, did you know that roger waters is a trostkyist? he does a good job of sounding like an upper-class liberal. (don't get me wrong, i like most of waters' vocal work). and, what ever happened to moya, anyways? the comparison, at the time, seemed very real. i didn't realize that the actual reason mt. zion lost the buzz was actually because this is a mostly mesmerizing record that flew over most everybody's head. had i actually listened to it, i wouldn't have made such a set of ridiculously bad assumptions.
musically, the record sounds like a realization of the sound they were toying with on their previous record. spaces that would have been repetitive, nicey-nice minimalism over there have become crashing, dissonant vocal sections over here. i used to think of this as a correcting process, but in hindsight i think it's better to think of it as a culminary one. this is the first and last perfected realization of what they were initially hinting at. while the record does retain a sense of the previous one's aimlessness, it is elevated to a tragic flaw, here.
something else that's become apparent to me is that the bulk of the best material from the collective has been defined by thierry's bass work. the truth is their discography is very spotty, and i've long struggled to understand why there's such a disparity within it. that it's the bassist isn't likely something that is going to be obvious; it will likely need to be explicitly pointed out before it's realized. his bass parts only jump out in isolated places, but it seems to be that what really takes some of the collective's tracks to the next level is defined by whether or not he's driving them from the bottom end. the nature of a collective is slightly different than that of a band; he's not equally involved on every track, and in truth juggles a great deal of things with his time. this record, however, features him fairly prominently on the first three tracks, which are three of the band's most powerful.
while it fits easily onto a compact disc, this was meant to be listened to as four full-length record sides. the tracks are consequently entirely self-contained, each exploring something just a little bit different than the last. the record opens with the band introducing a vocal technique, the rondeau, which would become a central focus of their writing over the next few records; here, it is presented tongue-in-cheek as a practiced exercise. coupled with the powerful figured bass work, it gives the band a decidedly renaissance feel that very much suits them. it maybe tries a little too hard to be a little too epic, and in the process maybe drags on just a little too long. the second track is the best example of how this record sounds like a fully realized version of the last one. the minimalism has recaptured it's dissonance, and been propped up by a vocal section that better retains the listener's attention. it eventually builds into a schizophrenic romp that radiohead could have only contemplated actually constructing. i've variously interpreted the topic of the vocal sections in the middle of this record to be about missile attacks into gaza or about missile defence in canada. the vocals themselves are defined by a sort of sloganized paranoia that melds into the repetition-based writing by repeating disturbed and disturbing statements in co-ordination with the crescendos as they rise, explode and fall. the third track manages to convincingly channel genesis c. 1971 without ripping on them, although i have to wonder if the reference to weeds thriving is conscious or not. is this song about ariel sharon or george bush? are the burning children eating dust in iraq or palestine? the slow defeat of whose reckless destiny? is the malfunctioning fence the israeli "security fence" or the proposed missile shield around north america? the final track is a much less compelling piece, apparently an homage to the band's roots. it seems to signal a desire to leave the sound that is presented here behind and move forward, which was certainly accomplished, albeit with varying results. it accurately foreshadows the less interesting direction the band would take on the next few discs.
i've long had a suspicion that somebody in the band has a keen interest in the music i'm working on. i may have attracted their attention through writing that i posted to their mailing list; years later, i noticed a certain efrim (of no specific last name) following my commentary at the cbc news site. there are various moments on "lift yr skinny fists", including the cover art, that seem borrowed from some demos i had sent to constellation. there was a song on one demo called "curious george" that featured samples of george bush cut up. there are also moments on "born into trouble" that seem curiously similar to ideas i had worked out on that demo, including a section of wilderness sounds. this record continues that trend in a number of strange ways. the first half of the second track seems to be based on the introduction of a demo i recorded with a friend, called "clarity". the main riff that dominates the first track seems to be borrowed from a demo i constructed in 1999, while the processed middle section of the last track almost sounds sampled from the end section of clarity. i don't know how they could have heard these things without investigating. on later records, it would even seem as though i eventually become the topic of the lyrics. am i so vain? or am i an object of fascination? i am not making accusations, as the compositions are substantially altered and the influence is circular, anyways. further, i would rather have my ideas orchestrated and distributed than left to die in obscurity. i record this solely for the sake of curiosity and historical interest. whether i'm right or not is really now a question for historians to investigate; if i am correct, i am a person of interest to history, so, to history, i merely offer some clues.
had the disc been pared down just a tad, it would have been flawless. despite my apprehension about the vocal contents of the record, the middle two tracks are really just phenomenal realizations of vocal post-rock (post post-rock?), almost without parallel. it's not any specific track that is problematic, so much as it is that several sections repeat beyond their point of interest. while there's maybe a sense of bravery and anti-thesis in moving from a fully developed sound to a stripped down folk feel, the end result isn't particularly compelling and it ends the disc on a disappointingly weak note. on balance, though, it's a very strong disc that i'll strongly recommend, up to the aforementioned caveats.
stream:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ayayvh3eYBg&list=PLnpQFjefXCRP9CvyWjh2DUSkpe9zkE29W
http://dghjdfsghkrdghdgja.appspot.com/categories/music/artists/ASilverMtZion/2003-ThisIsOurPunkRock/index.html
Friday, September 27, 2013
maybe those seemingly laughable solipsistic quantum mystics that successfully manage to trick gullible idiots into thinking their ideas are rooted in physics are on to something after all. this song jumped into my head a few hours ago, out of nowhere. now it's on the radio. it was a pretty popular song in the mid 90s, but it's a strange coincidence, to say the least. did i create that?
stop laughing, i'm serious.
neat coincidence, though.
stop laughing, i'm serious.
neat coincidence, though.
Wednesday, September 25, 2013
i'm supposed to be mad at teksavvy, but i'm seeing through it and am
pissed at cogeco - double for trying to get me pissed at teksavvy.
basically, cogeco just didn't respond to the request for a hookup. so i got stuck at the end of the queue. this has been happening to other people. it's a conscious attempt by the companies that own the lines to coerce customers back into their arms.
the telecommunications situation in canada is pretty awful and i think just about everybody realizes it. the predictable response is for greater markets. more competition. well, if it wasn't for these other companies, i wouldn't be getting a better deal, right? i'd be stuck overpaying cogeco for shitty access, right? hooray for markets, right? let's open it up further. more competition will bring the price down...
ugh. idiots.
i think we can all agree that the problem is the oligopoly that exists, but what seems to fly over people's heads is that the problem is rooted in private ownership of the lines. you can open up the market forever, create infinitely many service providers, but if the lines remain under the ownership of a single company then there's nothing that can be done to resolve the price gouging. the infrastructure is inherently monopolistic.
i don't need to go very far left to get a reasonable answer. none other than that paragon of liberal free market theory, adam smith, was well aware that some services cannot operate under a market. forget about whether or not markets work (of course, they don't). markets in certain things are impossible. roads, for example. liberals once included power generation and phone lines in this list. you can add cable lines in. there's going to be a monopoly, whether market fundamentalists like it or not. the choice is between a public and a private monopoly.
we should really be thinking of cable lines the same way we think of roads. they should be publicly owned and administered through taxation. this would actually succeed in bringing the price down by cutting out the profit motive.
so, i'm hereby calling for the nationalization of the cable system.
basically, cogeco just didn't respond to the request for a hookup. so i got stuck at the end of the queue. this has been happening to other people. it's a conscious attempt by the companies that own the lines to coerce customers back into their arms.
the telecommunications situation in canada is pretty awful and i think just about everybody realizes it. the predictable response is for greater markets. more competition. well, if it wasn't for these other companies, i wouldn't be getting a better deal, right? i'd be stuck overpaying cogeco for shitty access, right? hooray for markets, right? let's open it up further. more competition will bring the price down...
ugh. idiots.
i think we can all agree that the problem is the oligopoly that exists, but what seems to fly over people's heads is that the problem is rooted in private ownership of the lines. you can open up the market forever, create infinitely many service providers, but if the lines remain under the ownership of a single company then there's nothing that can be done to resolve the price gouging. the infrastructure is inherently monopolistic.
i don't need to go very far left to get a reasonable answer. none other than that paragon of liberal free market theory, adam smith, was well aware that some services cannot operate under a market. forget about whether or not markets work (of course, they don't). markets in certain things are impossible. roads, for example. liberals once included power generation and phone lines in this list. you can add cable lines in. there's going to be a monopoly, whether market fundamentalists like it or not. the choice is between a public and a private monopoly.
we should really be thinking of cable lines the same way we think of roads. they should be publicly owned and administered through taxation. this would actually succeed in bringing the price down by cutting out the profit motive.
so, i'm hereby calling for the nationalization of the cable system.
Tuesday, September 24, 2013
Re: [Ticket#2013090510064962] Payment instructions
From: Accounting Department <accounting@teksavvy.com>
To: death.to.koalas@gmail.com
Hello,
Unfortunately with the Roger's technicians if the call is not answered they do not show up to the appointment. You will need to advise your grandmother of the date of install and advise her to answer any call that comes in on that day or provide us with an alternate number you will be reached at.
Thanks for choosing TekSavvy and please don't hesitate to email us back or give us a call at the number below!
To: death.to.koalas@gmail.com
Hello,
Unfortunately with the Roger's technicians if the call is not answered they do not show up to the appointment. You will need to advise your grandmother of the date of install and advise her to answer any call that comes in on that day or provide us with an alternate number you will be reached at.
Thanks for choosing TekSavvy and please don't hesitate to email us back or give us a call at the number below!
Re: [Ticket#2013090510064962] Payment instructions
From: Jessica Murray <death.to.koalas@gmail.com>
To: Accounting Department <accounting@teksavvy.com>
hi.
the hookup should happen tomorrow. i just reviewed the email that was sent, and it notes that somebody has to answer the phone. i don't actually currently have a phone that i can be reached it in real time. the number that was given is my grandmother's number in ottawa, which is where i was staying before i recently moved to windsor. i gave that number because you required one. certainly, she can email if you leave her a message, but i can't guarantee that she'll answer the phone when somebody calls. however, i can guarantee that i will be on location, waiting for the hookup person.
jessica
To: Accounting Department <accounting@teksavvy.com>
hi.
the hookup should happen tomorrow. i just reviewed the email that was sent, and it notes that somebody has to answer the phone. i don't actually currently have a phone that i can be reached it in real time. the number that was given is my grandmother's number in ottawa, which is where i was staying before i recently moved to windsor. i gave that number because you required one. certainly, she can email if you leave her a message, but i can't guarantee that she'll answer the phone when somebody calls. however, i can guarantee that i will be on location, waiting for the hookup person.
jessica
Tuesday, September 17, 2013
the silver mt. zion memorial orchestra & tra-la-la band - born into trouble as the sparks fly upward
Disappointment
i initially found this record incredibly disappointing, and have to interject a level of frustration attached to that, as it was also the point where people that i knew began listening to the band. yeah, i liked these guys before they were cool and got a little irked when they started selling more records. this was the record that penetrated the outside world, and brought people back to gybe! by proxy (it wasn't the other way around). i suppose that, for a lot of people, it defined the collective, and that is unfortunate because it is actually fairly atypical.
it was never about not wanting to share. in fact, i tried pretty hard to share. "hey guys, listen to this!"; "i'm going to a concert on wednesday night, wanna come?"; "i made you this cd-r because i think you'll really like it"; etc. i was fairly persistent, even. reactions ran the boredom spectrum from passively ignoring to openly dismissing: "it's just some more of that weird music j likes". once presented, however, with an endorsement by an official Figure of Authority - somebody on the radio, for example - minds opened quickly. "hey j, you should check out this band i've been listening to, the silver mt zions, i think you might like it". ugh. such is the actual truth of being a real hipster.
further, it wouldn't even have bothered me so much if this wasn't, by far, their worst record to date. sure, go ahead and send moya viral - or whatever the early 00s equivalent of viral was. it deserved it. i did my part in trying. this record? not really. in the end, misanthropy prevailed. once again.
at the time, it seemed to me like the band was going through burnout from over touring, but, in hindsight, it seems more like they were going through a learning curve. there are a number of people involved on this disc that weren't previously involved. what i initially perceived as a lack of ideas may in reality be a sort of orientation process. perhaps these tracks are overly simple and overly repetitive for the simple reason that that is what happens when musicians write records when they are still in the process of building chemistry with each other. the flip side of this is that it allowed space for the production to be exceedingly strong. this is an aspect of the band that sadly dissipated as the band shifted from a studio side project to a main focus live act, and that hits it's apex here.
bad production can ruin a record, and excellent production can take a set of good songs to the next level, but infinite buckets of the most glistening production in the world can't save a collection of haphazardly thrown together songs, which is what this is underneath it's shiny exterior. it's maybe better to analyze it as a record, as it seems like that is how they meant to construct it. it also provides the proper perspective in understanding the record's flaws...
two of the first three tracks are redundant. it almost seems as though they wrote three introductions to the fourth track, couldn't figure out which one they wanted to use, and so included all three of them. personally, i prefer the first of the three, with it's processed guitar work. i'm predictable. you may prefer the production work on the second, or the monologue on the third. something could be said regarding combining the three ideas into one track. the key is recognizing their redundancy in the context of the record's flow as a more profound explanation (than their minimalism) as to why the record seems uneventful and boring until the distortion finally kicks in.
it is difficult to understate the importance of the fourth track on the band's career trajectory and the montreal music scene in general. it was a sort of a hit single in certain circles. personally, i found it highly alienating in it's references to 80s hair metal and have never warmed up to it. this goes back to the frustration surrounding this record's larger appeal; i tend to avoid accusations of sell-out, but they were definitely floating around the internet. regardless, the appeal of this track is what set in motion the forces that produced that wave of soulless, corporate pop bands from montreal (like the arcade fire, who are from texas and merely struck oil in the st. lawrence). "good" is a very vague term, but there is simply no argument that can lead to describing this track that way, whether you happen to have guilty pleasures inclined that way or not.
the second half of the record has a few higher points, but is no more coherent. track five repeats the long, drawn-out, go-nowhere minimalist theme that dominates the first half of the disc. something these musicians understand in most of their recordings, and yet is absent almost entirely on this disc, is that minimalism requires tension to prevent it from getting boring. over touring or orientation? it's a secondary question. the sixth track is thematically tied back to the first disc, and may even be an outtake, while the seventh is a highly self-indulgent and very badly pasted together studio construction. by the time you get to the last track, you may be shocked to find a nice tune with compelling vocals amongst the rest of this drudgery; it really sounds remarkably out of place here. it always did.
i've periodically debated increasing the grading of this record and have always convinced myself not to. i recognize that, for a lot of people, this is the record that they understand the collective through, compare all their other works to, etc. might i be wrong? if all these other people think otherwise, should i reconsider? what i continually convince myself of is that these songs are objectively poorly constructed (it goes beyond disagreeable stylistic shifts) and that while my continuing reaction is highly personal it is nonetheless based upon a rejection that is rooted in objective terms. it doesn't matter how one approaches this record, it is written in a style of correct, tonal minimalism that is objectively boring.
you're allowed to like boring music if you want, or if the radio convinces you to, but i need to be more honest: this is a disc that can only work as background, and doesn't even work well as background because of the abrupt shifts in volume. while there are legitimately moments on the disc that the band cannot be separated from, i do not recommend the disc at all and will very adamantly reject suggestions that it is a "good", "easy" or "accessible" introduction to the band.
stream:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5ihOcGNBi8&list=PLnpQFjefXCRMStU4rO7P-9iI2koNNaHIa
http://dghjdfsghkrdghdgja.appspot.com/categories/music/artists/ASilverMtZion/2001-BornIntoTrouble/index.html
Monday, September 16, 2013
Saturday, September 14, 2013
a silver mt. zion - he has left us alone but shafts of light sometimes grace the corner of our rooms
Benchmark
there are some records that are best to listen to lying flat on your back, through a pair of high quality headphones. it should be immediately clear, from the opening chords, that a silver mt zion's first record is one of these records. if you do not believe me, give it a try and notice the high pedal tone underneath the now iconic opening broken chords, along with the sound of the drummer walking in and picking up his drumsticks.
the stereo separation is also a fundamental part of the record, and will be largely missed through a pair of speakers. the heavily reverberated soundscape presented here really demands your full attention; your headphones are a virtual reality headset, taking you to a different plane of existence, in which this is your soundtrack....
the theme here is floating, as brought out by the airplane and rocket imagery. sure, you could take the literal approach and think of it as a soundtrack for a doomed air flight, or as sitting between three galloping dogs. you may also interpret it, variously, as flying through hyperspace, as buzzing through flower patches or, perhaps, as falling through purgatory.
i don't know if they ever corrected the record sleeve, but the one that came with the initial pressings of the disk were sort of confusing. it splits the disk up into two proper pieces, each with four movements. however, the last movement of the first piece is an isolated show tune, and the second movement of the second piece is seven seconds long. judging by the track titles, the correct tracklisting is something like this:
i) 13 angels...track 5
ii) long march rocket...track 7
iii) blown-out joy...beginning of track 8
iv) for wanda ....end of track 8
...but that positions 'for wanda' as barely it's own song. the record is really better analyzed as two minimalist pieces, each with three movements, separated by a vocal interlude.
the first track begins with a joke that is so subtle that almost everybody missed it. the band's sense of humour is more clear now than it was then, so i think my claim that the track is a parody should come off as less outlandish now than it did when they were perceived as a bunch of esoteric weirdos living in a shack by the railroad tracks, pumping out obfuscated anarchist manifestos like some kind of musical grothendieck. see, there were many hours spent debating this point. yet, it really does seem clear that the samples were chosen to poke fun of the radio announcer at least, and likely the audience by proxy. this day of peace, where there is no peace. what? no, don't turn to the page, i'll just read it to you. well, that doesn't sound like a request to think independently, now does it. be sober! be serious! that's just tongue-in-cheek.
the piece then opens up into a sort of apocalyptic waltz that runs through fast and slow sections of the same theme before it crashes in on itself in a series of descending piano runs. it's a simple theme, but it's built to maximum dramatic effect. more importantly, it's mixed to take up the entire spectrum, which is why you need your virtual reality gear for it. you're not listening to the notes, here. don't fall into that trap. you're experiencing the alternate reality produced by the notes.
i should point out here that this record was released almost two years before the september 11 attack, and anybody trying to tie the disc's track titles (such as "lonely as the sound of lying on the ground of an airplane going down" or "long march rocket or doomed airliner") to that event isn't presenting an informed analysis. at best, it's an interesting coincidence; at worst, it's an appropriation of the actual intent of the subject titles, which i've actually tended to interpret as references to a thomas pynchon classic entitled gravity's rainbow, which ends with a cursory character being launched out of a v2 rocket. at the time, the band actually claimed it was a tribute record to a recently deceased dog (wanda). of course, the titles also have vague, societal meanings and it's perfectly reasonable to leave them at that. however, other titles like "stumble then rise on some awkward morning" are consistent with the pynchon interpretation, as is the picture in the liner notes of a rocket coming out of an egg.
the separating track is called "movie (never made)" and is apparently a relic of precisely that. it was initially meant as a monologue to that film, which was never made. personally, i couldn't separate it from the show tune at this point if i wanted to. if efrim ever gets this movie put together, that bass rumble is going to start playing in my head whether he likes it or not. it's a powerful little track with some equally powerful vocals that i've swung back and forth on over the years. it may be a sad and angry and fucking naive rant, and i may only be able to understand jewish guilt over contemporary political issues on an abstract level, but he's right fucking on. he really is....
the second half of the record floats off into some netherworld full of loops and effects. your disney programming may interpret walking basslines with images of cats and thieves stalking through the night, but i'm going to try and pull you back to a feeling of disorientation. perhaps there is a cartoonish aspect of drunkenness in that as well, perhaps i'm just hearing the bohemian in it, but, for me, it conjures up images of levitation and of humans being spun, erratically, through an unknown field. the climax here is in a piano working up a thunderstorm that shatters the entire illusion, leaving only a distorted reflection that struggles to reassert itself through a haze of hyperrealism.
i suppose there's a middle point between gorgeous and gutwrenching. while it may primarily be a jam record, this disc really hits that sweet spot in ways that are rarely accomplished and i really can't recommend it highly enough.
stream:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVWLbNXsPfs&list=PLnpQFjefXCRPsmeGJ_xCo2B7SptySvOsA
http://dghjdfsghkrdghdgja.appspot.com/categories/music/artists/ASilverMtZion/2000-HeHasLeftUsAlone/index.html
Friday, September 13, 2013
studio art
sadly, this is the only shirt i have to proudly display on my wall. i left my retired shirts, amongst other things, in the safe keeping of my father, who wasn't able to prevent my step-mother from discarding them as "old rags". i guess they weren't on sale at winners, and consequently weren't acceptable to have in her basement. anyways...
i at least got some shots of my other retired shirts before i moved out of my last place. i'm going to expect compensation in the form of replacement shirts that i can wear back down to worthless rags, and then place on my wall.
they were sending these out with early shipments of the first mt zion record.
i had a come on die young poster, but it has also disappeared...
i believe this came with a floyd record in the early 70s, but i don't remember which one.
i also had a really swell massive genesis tour poster from 1973 (i think) with gabriel in flower costume. i think i may be able to relocate this one...
the hendrix and lennon are also guitar world insets. the sketch is kind of neat: i was busking on the steps of ubc, and a student randomly came up to me and handed it to me. she had been stealthily sketching me for twenty minutes...
missing would be a similar sketch that an ex made of me. she has dozens, perhaps hundreds, of sketches of me. or, at least, she used to. she's been coy about the continued existence of these sketches. it was a nice sketch of me playing, but precisely what i was doing is not really the value of the sketch. i may be able to get a replacement sketch...
also missing: my certificate of provenance. now, that's a downer. how am i supposed to demonstrate my provenance without my certificate? i'd just send off an email to the band, but they're kind of both dead, so i guess i'm fucked with that one....
Wednesday, September 11, 2013
TekSavvy Order Confirmation
From: <support@teksavvy.com>
To: <death.to.koalas@gmail.com>
Thank you for choosing TekSavvy for your Internet needs!
TekSavvy Solutions, Inc. : Account Information
Your preferred language: English
Your preferred daytime contact telephone number:
On the date of activation we require that someone be onsite, and able to answer the technicians confirmation call to the telephone number above (typically approximately 30 minutes before arrival). Failure to answer this call may result in your order being rescheduled. Someone 18 years or older must be present at your location for the dispatch.
Please be advised that TekSavvy and/or Cogeco are not responsible for any wiring past your cable jack/wall outlet.
Your first bill was processed today, and your monthly prepaid billing date from now on will be on the 20 of each month, starting in October. Please see below for a detailed list of the first month charges.
Your TekSavvy Cable 6 Lite service is set to be tentatively activated on 25-09-2013. Please note that your activation date could be delayed up to 10 business days due to unanticipated circumstances. You should expect a follow-up email confirming the appointment time. If you have not received this email 48 hours prior to your first appointment choice, please contact us as soon as possible so that we may investigate.
You have 75 GB of data transfer (bandwidth) included with your account. This includes both upload and download.
Please save this order confirmation email. If you see something incorrect and need to make a change, please contact our customer service department at 1-877-779-1575 immediately. Failure to advise us of the corrections 2 business days prior to the activation date may result in delays or additional fees.
Your Account # is:
Total charges for the first month
Shipping - Canada Post: $10.00
Activation Discount: -$20.00
Activation fee: $44.95
Modem: $99.00
Cable 6 Lite: $24.95
Subtotal: $158.90
ON HST:$20.66
Total: $179.56
We would appreciate if you could verify the information on this order by clicking below. You will be redirected to our confirmation system. Once your order is confirmed we will not need to contact you and as such if you have any problems or concerns you will need to communicate with us to make us aware of the problem.
Click To Confirm
To: <death.to.koalas@gmail.com>
Thank you for choosing TekSavvy for your Internet needs!
TekSavvy Solutions, Inc. : Account Information
Your preferred language: English
Your preferred daytime contact telephone number:
On the date of activation we require that someone be onsite, and able to answer the technicians confirmation call to the telephone number above (typically approximately 30 minutes before arrival). Failure to answer this call may result in your order being rescheduled. Someone 18 years or older must be present at your location for the dispatch.
Please be advised that TekSavvy and/or Cogeco are not responsible for any wiring past your cable jack/wall outlet.
Your first bill was processed today, and your monthly prepaid billing date from now on will be on the 20 of each month, starting in October. Please see below for a detailed list of the first month charges.
Your TekSavvy Cable 6 Lite service is set to be tentatively activated on 25-09-2013. Please note that your activation date could be delayed up to 10 business days due to unanticipated circumstances. You should expect a follow-up email confirming the appointment time. If you have not received this email 48 hours prior to your first appointment choice, please contact us as soon as possible so that we may investigate.
You have 75 GB of data transfer (bandwidth) included with your account. This includes both upload and download.
Please save this order confirmation email. If you see something incorrect and need to make a change, please contact our customer service department at 1-877-779-1575 immediately. Failure to advise us of the corrections 2 business days prior to the activation date may result in delays or additional fees.
Your Account # is:
Total charges for the first month
Shipping - Canada Post: $10.00
Activation Discount: -$20.00
Activation fee: $44.95
Modem: $99.00
Cable 6 Lite: $24.95
Subtotal: $158.90
ON HST:$20.66
Total: $179.56
We would appreciate if you could verify the information on this order by clicking below. You will be redirected to our confirmation system. Once your order is confirmed we will not need to contact you and as such if you have any problems or concerns you will need to communicate with us to make us aware of the problem.
Click To Confirm
Tuesday, September 10, 2013
1000 homo djs - supernaut
Collector's Item
this is a strange little ep that brings together three disparate al jourgenson side projects. it could have only been released as a throw away to fans, and maybe to get some extra drug money. regardless, it has become a sort of a special little collector's item for fans of several different bands.
the first of these projects is a cover of black sabbath's supernaut (and if you have a good eye, you'll note the cover art parody), with trent reznor on vocals. maybe. see, there's a big story around this that i'll quickly summarize: reznor's label demanded that the vocals be removed and jourgenson responded by claiming he used an alternate take with his own vocals in the first place so there was nothing to remove. reliable sources claim jourgenson was trolling the label and the released product had reznor on vocals. so, there's been an open question ever since: did al actually redo the vocals? well, they did sound fairly similar back then, but i've listened to lots of trent and lots of al and it sounds like.....both. trent doesn't howl like al, that's a stylistic giveaway, and you can hear a bit of al's accent here and there, but at points it sounds exactly like trent, too. it's actually a duet, and was probably meant as one. an "original" version with reznor on vocals was released years later in a special box set, and nobody can hear the difference. as for the track? it doesn't stray much from the original.
the second track appears to be a lard outtake. it's an effective satire, and a good party trick, but isn't something much of anybody is going to want to listen to repeatedly. well, if you can find me somebody that wants to repeatedly listen to an asshole cop being an asshole for eight minutes...
the last two tracks, however, are a lot better. the name, '1000 homo djs', stems from a comment somebody made about early ministry that al thought was comical enough to appropriate. well, that's typical. al really likes to have some sardonic fun with the less intelligent members of our species. so, these last two tracks are what al thought that "1000 homo djs" would want to listen to. :). they're actually from the period right after twitch and consequently seem to capture him in a sort of pivot point, right where he's moving away from synth pop and into satirical electro-metal cyber-punk. it catches him in a sort of a middle point that seems strongly informed by the type of punk rock that was branching out into grunge at the time. it's bluntly catchy and rather different than anything else jourgenson would ever release.
lyrically, though, these are both little gems. it begins with a convincing call to reject bourgeois politics in favour of misanthropy, and to do so with the enticing flair of a homo dj, and it ends with a plea for something better than spending the nights buying rounds while they send our loved ones off to die for no reason...
what you really want is the apathy single, but you won't find that anywhere. i'm not even sure if you'll find this disc any more. i can't claim an ep should have been an ep, so i have to be honest: if you're not a collector, this is best downloaded for free.
those last two tracks are worth checking out, though.
stream:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcJaZ-Hrr3Q
http://dghjdfsghkrdghdgja.appspot.com/categories/music/artists/1000HomoDJs/1990-Supernaut/index.html
this is a strange little ep that brings together three disparate al jourgenson side projects. it could have only been released as a throw away to fans, and maybe to get some extra drug money. regardless, it has become a sort of a special little collector's item for fans of several different bands.
the first of these projects is a cover of black sabbath's supernaut (and if you have a good eye, you'll note the cover art parody), with trent reznor on vocals. maybe. see, there's a big story around this that i'll quickly summarize: reznor's label demanded that the vocals be removed and jourgenson responded by claiming he used an alternate take with his own vocals in the first place so there was nothing to remove. reliable sources claim jourgenson was trolling the label and the released product had reznor on vocals. so, there's been an open question ever since: did al actually redo the vocals? well, they did sound fairly similar back then, but i've listened to lots of trent and lots of al and it sounds like.....both. trent doesn't howl like al, that's a stylistic giveaway, and you can hear a bit of al's accent here and there, but at points it sounds exactly like trent, too. it's actually a duet, and was probably meant as one. an "original" version with reznor on vocals was released years later in a special box set, and nobody can hear the difference. as for the track? it doesn't stray much from the original.
the second track appears to be a lard outtake. it's an effective satire, and a good party trick, but isn't something much of anybody is going to want to listen to repeatedly. well, if you can find me somebody that wants to repeatedly listen to an asshole cop being an asshole for eight minutes...
the last two tracks, however, are a lot better. the name, '1000 homo djs', stems from a comment somebody made about early ministry that al thought was comical enough to appropriate. well, that's typical. al really likes to have some sardonic fun with the less intelligent members of our species. so, these last two tracks are what al thought that "1000 homo djs" would want to listen to. :). they're actually from the period right after twitch and consequently seem to capture him in a sort of pivot point, right where he's moving away from synth pop and into satirical electro-metal cyber-punk. it catches him in a sort of a middle point that seems strongly informed by the type of punk rock that was branching out into grunge at the time. it's bluntly catchy and rather different than anything else jourgenson would ever release.
lyrically, though, these are both little gems. it begins with a convincing call to reject bourgeois politics in favour of misanthropy, and to do so with the enticing flair of a homo dj, and it ends with a plea for something better than spending the nights buying rounds while they send our loved ones off to die for no reason...
what you really want is the apathy single, but you won't find that anywhere. i'm not even sure if you'll find this disc any more. i can't claim an ep should have been an ep, so i have to be honest: if you're not a collector, this is best downloaded for free.
those last two tracks are worth checking out, though.
stream:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcJaZ-Hrr3Q
http://dghjdfsghkrdghdgja.appspot.com/categories/music/artists/1000HomoDJs/1990-Supernaut/index.html
Monday, September 9, 2013
Sunday, September 8, 2013
54-40 - smilin' buddha cabaret
hit and miss
eeeeeeeeeeeeye, eye-eye-eye've got an ocean prrrrrl...
it's easy to forget that "grunge" was a north-west phenomenon, not a strictly seattle one. geographically, vancouver is actually closer to seattle than portland, oregon is. of the handful of "grunge" bands that came out of vancouver in the early to mid 80s, 54-40 is probably the most well known and this record, which was massively successful in canada, is probably their most well known, as well, due to the track ocean pearl, which seemed to be on every radio station and every television channel for most of the summer of 1994. while they're not afraid to hit a harder edge sound that i find most reminiscent of mudhoney, the act generally operates in REM territory, mixing straight-ahead alternative rock with acoustic ballads, jangle pop and the odd little studio trick.
while a profound part of my early teenage alt-rock leftist programming, the record doesn't really stand up to too much scrutiny all these years later. there are actually quite a few different styles present here, but somebody else did all of it better somewhere else. U2 did blame your parents better, the ramones did radio luv song better, nirvana did assoholic better, neil young did once a killer better, REM did punk grass better (on monster), sloan did lucy better, pearl jam did beyond the outsider better, soundgarden did don't listen to that better, my bloody valentine did save yourself better, etc. in a sense, the disc works well as a gen y primer to alt. rock, but there's no reason to recommend it ahead of the other, much better records that were released in 1994. on the other hand, if you want to seriously explore 54-40, the better material is all in the 80s.
that being said, the record does have a strong point in it's largely satirical lyrical content, which has some fun with tearing down various aspects of popular culture. this is the actual appeal that the record still has to me, all of these years later. unfortunately, though, the disc is heavily front-loaded. the last four tracks just don't have the bite that the first four do. there's a strong argument that the disc should have been an ep, and it would have been a very good one if it was one.
lastly, please heed this warning: listen to ocean pearl at your own peril, as it WILL get stuck in your head for weeks.
stream:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2Z7U15ut3k&list=PL7epfunGutqmyO2XIffOqjR89K1ADyujv
http://dghjdfsghkrdghdgja.appspot.com/categories/music/artists/54-40/1994-SmilinBuddhaCabaret/index.html
Saturday, September 7, 2013
1-Speed Bike - Droopy Butt Begone!
Collector's Item
when i first picked this up, it didn't do very much for me. there will be inevitable suggestions of music constructed with electronics being out of the realm of the average luddite gybe! fanatic, but no such thing would apply to me. it was quite the opposite; the disc seemed too repetitive and not complex enough to satisfy my elite tastes in the electronic spectrum.
it has held up surprisingly well, though. well, ok, some of the spoken word seems a little juvenile. if you didn't have "enough" (??) friends, would you be quiet until you did? is your confidence determined by the solidarity you command, rather than the other way around? i may be keenly interested in the free goat cheese that you're offering after the revolution, but this idea that your analysis is only as valid as the number of people that agree with it is sort of totalitarian and frightening. truth by consensus, people; we'll have a vote on the validity of the laws of thermodynamics after supper, and whether or not they're oppressive in denying perpetual motion. i could continue, but to what end?
i somehow missed a lot of the subtlety in the recording. i'm not really quite sure how. i'm sure i would have listened to it through headphones, although my memories mostly involve listening to it on low volume in the middle of the night while living beside a noisy furnace. i think maybe i didn't miss it so much as i ignored it as ambience. for whatever reason, it is coming out at me in much higher quality right now. this is making the record sound better produced than i would have initially said it was, but it isn't adding anything to the songs themselves.
in it's most basic description, this is "drum and bass" with a tempo that is closer to trip-hop than to jungle. you could get away with calling it trip-hop. the record is largely built around cut up drum loops that aidan performed himself. i'm still suspecting that he's using reel-to-reel loops through large portions of it due to the nature of the loops, but the production does seem more electronic now than it did then. at the very least, he seems to be sampling parts that were treated with old fashioned effects work. a lot of the bass and string samples, though, seem to be ultimately coming from his bandmates. you can pick out parts from fly pan am songs, gybe! songs, etc.
in the end, it's just somebody fucking around with samples. that person has a particularly interesting sample source to play with, but that doesn't transcend it from what it is. the 1-speed bike seems to be a reference to the lack of variation in the tempo, which is something that makes the record drag a bit. it does work well as background music - perhaps for reading, or perhaps for eating (it is, after all, dedicated to the dishwasher) - but there isn't anything about the record that makes it worth finding.
...except the label it was released on and the person that produced it; this is an item for collectors.
i wish i would have been in montreal more often back in the day, though, to hear aidan spin in real time.
stream:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mz3ncaHBf-k&list=OLAK5uy_kU8J_OldZQA1XOpzwDtIgd1kVaUWbY11o
http://dghjdfsghkrdghdgja.appspot.com/categories/music/artists/1-speedbike/2000-DroopyButtBegone/index.html
Friday, September 6, 2013
Thursday, September 5, 2013
last transition persies (upload)
Re: Payment instructions
From: Jessica Murray <death.to.koalas@gmail.com>
To: accounting@teksavvy.com
hi, this is the confirmation number.
****************
To: accounting@teksavvy.com
hi, this is the confirmation number.
****************
Wednesday, September 4, 2013
Payment instructions
From: accounting@teksavvy.com
To: death.to.koalas@gmail.com
We have received your order; thank you for thinking of us.
As stated at time of registration, we are a prepaid service and we require confirmation of payment before we can process your order.
To make an online or telephone banking payment:
1. Add Teksavvy Solutions Inc as a new payee account to your bank
2. Add your account number: *******
3. Total amount due: $179.56
4. After you make the payment, obtain the confirmation number from the payment
5. Call Teksavvy with the confirmation number 1-877-779-1575, or reply back to this email.
Orders are held in our system for 48 hours. After that time the order is cancelled, and the process will need to be started over.
To: death.to.koalas@gmail.com
We have received your order; thank you for thinking of us.
As stated at time of registration, we are a prepaid service and we require confirmation of payment before we can process your order.
To make an online or telephone banking payment:
1. Add Teksavvy Solutions Inc as a new payee account to your bank
2. Add your account number: *******
3. Total amount due: $179.56
4. After you make the payment, obtain the confirmation number from the payment
5. Call Teksavvy with the confirmation number 1-877-779-1575, or reply back to this email.
Orders are held in our system for 48 hours. After that time the order is cancelled, and the process will need to be started over.
Tuesday, September 3, 2013
Jessica Amber Murray
(...) let's take a step back to the iww. let us say we have a factory that is mechanizing, and is about to lay off thousands of workers as well as reduce the hours of the workers it keeps. would you expect the iww to support or oppose this? and aren't you supposed to be out of the hospital today?
ESA
They would support the works and the workers laid off
Well i mean. Its so fucking small these days, the iww has like no power or money
So it doesnt matter.
Jessica Amber Murray
see, i'd support mechanization as being on the path to communism. i'll show up to wage theft cases and show my support, though. and other things. but it's just not something i can *join*. lol @ it doesn't matter. just a sec, i have a song for you....
(...) let's take a step back to the iww. let us say we have a factory that is mechanizing, and is about to lay off thousands of workers as well as reduce the hours of the workers it keeps. would you expect the iww to support or oppose this? and aren't you supposed to be out of the hospital today?
ESA
They would support the works and the workers laid off
Well i mean. Its so fucking small these days, the iww has like no power or money
So it doesnt matter.
Jessica Amber Murray
see, i'd support mechanization as being on the path to communism. i'll show up to wage theft cases and show my support, though. and other things. but it's just not something i can *join*. lol @ it doesn't matter. just a sec, i have a song for you....
i just ordered it this morning; i have been connecting through fast food outlets for a month and will have to continue doing so until the 25th. i ended up going with 6, for $24.95, through teksavvy. it is a little odd that they have stable pricing through ontario whereas everybody else has a higher cost in the cogeco areas so i was a little skeptical last night that what they had on their web site was actually accurate. it is, indeed, a stable price across the province, though.
$25 is actually pretty cheap. and i do not like being rationed, but 75 GB is about twice what i will use in an average month, so i had to crack on that....
$25 is actually pretty cheap. and i do not like being rationed, but 75 GB is about twice what i will use in an average month, so i had to crack on that....
wow. cogeco is worse than rogers. i did not think it was possible to be worse than rogers.
one bad thing about windsor is that the internet is expensive. there may be some rumours about bad infrastructure, but i am not really buying it. it just seems to be that cogeco is charging independent isps more than rogers is for the use of their lines. of course, i insist upon an independent isp due to usage limits. i may rarely go over 35 gb, but i just resent being rationed.
some evidence: consider vmedia, which offers services in areas where both rogers and cogeco own the lines. for some reason, the cogeco areas are both substantially more expensive and substantially slower. because windsor is more affluent than toronto, i suppose. right. it just appears to be simple price gouging by cogeco for the purposes of dissuading competition. somebody send the anti-competition board after the fuckers...
it appears like i am going to have to resort to a dsl line at under 10 mbps. of course, reality is that 98% of web pages only let you download at a fraction of that, anyways. nowadays, download speed is determined more by the server you are downloading from than it is by your connection speed. you are rarely going to get even close to 500 K, let alone 750, from much of anywhere except google and netflix. torrent speed only comes close to that when downloading top 40 shit. so, 8 or even 6 mbps is more than sufficient for most people. unless you happen to be connecting to game servers, or you want to watch tv online, or are renting out the service to everybody on your block, there is little reason to pay for more than that, anyways. the entire pricing scheme they have set up is really just a scam to take advantage of people. i mean, they have a plan at 300 mbps. lol. come on. who do you think you are downloading from at that speed....
still, the obvious gouging is obvious and i am sort of irked.
the real reason they push these absurd speeds that nobody can really ever use is to sucker people into their lower speeds, which are really no less ridiculous. if you tell somebody that they have the option between 10, 20, 25, and 50 then people will tend to go with 20 or 25 because it is the goldilocks option. they may not need the fastest, but they do not want to settle for the lowest. if you add 100, 150, 200 and 300, people will go with 50 or 100. of course, most of these people will not need more than 10 - 20 would be overpaying in most cases. but by adding more expensive items in and providing more options you can bill them twice as much at no higher of a business cost.
the root problem here is that people just do not understand what it is that they are paying for.
it would be nice if that drove the lower speeds down in price, but there goes market theory not working once again. instead, they will slowly creep up - you can get 50 instead of 25 for *only* an extra $4 per month! well, until those options disappear altogether and the price just shifts up.
conclusion: fuck pointless advances in technology. higher costs at no real advantage. i would rather we stagnate a bit, thanks.
one bad thing about windsor is that the internet is expensive. there may be some rumours about bad infrastructure, but i am not really buying it. it just seems to be that cogeco is charging independent isps more than rogers is for the use of their lines. of course, i insist upon an independent isp due to usage limits. i may rarely go over 35 gb, but i just resent being rationed.
some evidence: consider vmedia, which offers services in areas where both rogers and cogeco own the lines. for some reason, the cogeco areas are both substantially more expensive and substantially slower. because windsor is more affluent than toronto, i suppose. right. it just appears to be simple price gouging by cogeco for the purposes of dissuading competition. somebody send the anti-competition board after the fuckers...
it appears like i am going to have to resort to a dsl line at under 10 mbps. of course, reality is that 98% of web pages only let you download at a fraction of that, anyways. nowadays, download speed is determined more by the server you are downloading from than it is by your connection speed. you are rarely going to get even close to 500 K, let alone 750, from much of anywhere except google and netflix. torrent speed only comes close to that when downloading top 40 shit. so, 8 or even 6 mbps is more than sufficient for most people. unless you happen to be connecting to game servers, or you want to watch tv online, or are renting out the service to everybody on your block, there is little reason to pay for more than that, anyways. the entire pricing scheme they have set up is really just a scam to take advantage of people. i mean, they have a plan at 300 mbps. lol. come on. who do you think you are downloading from at that speed....
still, the obvious gouging is obvious and i am sort of irked.
the real reason they push these absurd speeds that nobody can really ever use is to sucker people into their lower speeds, which are really no less ridiculous. if you tell somebody that they have the option between 10, 20, 25, and 50 then people will tend to go with 20 or 25 because it is the goldilocks option. they may not need the fastest, but they do not want to settle for the lowest. if you add 100, 150, 200 and 300, people will go with 50 or 100. of course, most of these people will not need more than 10 - 20 would be overpaying in most cases. but by adding more expensive items in and providing more options you can bill them twice as much at no higher of a business cost.
the root problem here is that people just do not understand what it is that they are paying for.
it would be nice if that drove the lower speeds down in price, but there goes market theory not working once again. instead, they will slowly creep up - you can get 50 instead of 25 for *only* an extra $4 per month! well, until those options disappear altogether and the price just shifts up.
conclusion: fuck pointless advances in technology. higher costs at no real advantage. i would rather we stagnate a bit, thanks.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)